2002 Gujarat violence In February 2002, about 58 people died in a train fire in Godhra, Gujarat. In the following days and weeks, it is reported that around 800 to 2000 people were killed throughout Gujarat in what have been called some of the worst communal riots seen in India since it gained independence. The perceived cause for the former incident is seen as triggering off the latter. Alternatively, it is believed that the 2002 riots arose after 58 Hindu pilgrims returning from Ayodhya were killed from a firebombing of the train carrying them by an alleged Muslim mob in Godhra. Subsequent riots led to death of 1000 people, mostly Muslims. The train fire in Godhra In February 2002, a sleeper coach in the train Sabarmati Express, coming from Faizabad and proceeding towards Ahmedabad caught fire a few minutes after it left the Godhra railway station on February 27, 2002, killing an estimated 58 people. The coach that was ravaged in the fire was occupied predominantly by members and sympathisers of the Sangh Parivar, called Kar Sevaks who were returning after a pilgrimage to Ayodhya, a place in North India and the site of the Babri Masjid-Ram Janma Bhoomi dispute. This incident was a precursor to a spate of widespread communal violence in the state which lasted nearly three months. The incident was widely reported in the media and the most commonly circulated version was that this was an incident of sabotage and arson, aimed at the Hindus. Because Godhra is a town with a Muslim majority, it was widely suspected that a few miscreants from that community were responsible for this ghastly incident. During the course of investigation, the central investigating agencies found evidence of arson. The Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) in its initial report, confirmed that the fire was fuelled by 60 litres of inflammable liquid. Though acceptance of the accounts so far described is almost unanimous, the following are the key points of contention between the various parties. A few eye-witnesses have testified that there was an altercation between a Kar Sevak and a Muslim tea vendor at the railway station preceding the catastrophe, apparently over the payment of the due amount. Some people claim that this incident had happened when the Kar Sevaks were on the way to Ayodhya, a few days earlier at the same station. The Sangh Parivar refutes the version and maintains that the passengers were the victims of unprovoked violence. There were also widespread, but unconfirmed reports to the effect that a Muslim girl was physically abused by a few people from inside the coach who tried to pull her inside the train. The Sangh Parivar vehemently disputes this claim. The FSL report had concluded controversially that since the doors of the coach were latched from the inside, there was a slim possibility that the liquid fuel was thrown from the outside, prior to setting the fire. This prompted opposition parties (Congress and the Communist Party of India) to point the accusing finger at Sangh Parivar, suspecting it of stage-managing the incident to stir up communal tension for political gains. However, a few survivors claimed that they had managed to escape through the doors, and this raised questions about the veracity and completeness of the investigation report. The Sangh Parivar also alleged that a local Congress opposition party member was involved in the arson. It alleged that the incident was not an act of immediate provocation and reaction, but one involving a deep-rooted controversy, involving terrorists. Kar sevaks are claimed by some to be an informal police force of the Sangh Parivar, who use violence as a means of solving social conflict, but are claimed by others to be those who indulge in social service by being attached to a Hindu temple. Points of view differ on how the fire happened. The initial point of view in the media was that a mob of local people (mostly Muslims) lit the fire. Another point of view, based on interviews with passengers on the train, witnesses to the incident, local police and railway officials suggest that the fire could not have been lit from the ground, and that its cause was an argument provoked by the kar sevaks that became increasingly heated (metaphorically) to the point of becoming heated in a literal (and lethal) sense. A common version of this interpretation claims that the Kar sevaks refused to pay for snacks they bought at the train station, that they physically assaulted an old bearded Muslim tea vendor, they abducted his young daughter, they took her to the S-6 coach, locked its doors and closed the windows. This point of view is criticised as an urban legend or conspiracy theory by some. Another point of view is that a member of the Congress (I) political party was the main person responsible. Many accusations were made about the media's role in reporting the fire: Many complained that the English language media in India, which they view as mainly communist, applauded the burning of Hindus by Muslims and stated that the Hindus asked for it. Some say that the story of Kar Sevaks assaulting the Muslim tea vendor's daughter and carrying her onto the train was presented by the Western media as fact despite being merely an urban legend. Another accusation is that the Gujarati language media uncritically quoted the words of Chief Minister Narendra Modi which supported revenge by Hindus against Muslims. The riots that followed In the massacre that followed the Godhra incident, it has been reported that over 2000 people were killed. Points of view differ on the number, with the figure 2000 being seen by some as an exaggeration, and by others as an underestimate. Points of view differ with respect to how these deaths occurred: some refer to these as riots while others refer to these as a pogrom. On February 28, in one incident in Ahmedabad, at Naroda Patia, across the road from the State Reserve Police (SRP) quarters, a crowd of about 5000 people set fire to the entire locality, gang-raping women and girls before killing them, altogether killing at least 65 people. The community mosque, Noorani Masjid, facing the SRP, was burnt using LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) cylinders. In the following days, hundreds of young people with swords, daggers, axes, and iron rods walked around the area, shouting "Jai Shri Ram". According to Human Rights Watch, who visited Naroda Patia three weeks later, http://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/india/India0402-02.htm#P274_48396 Muslim homes in the area were completely burnt but Hindu homes were not burnt at all. Several witnesses claimed that the police not only failed to protect residents' calls for help, but participated in the killings. Witnesses also claimed that Sangh Parivar members (from Bajrang Dal and Shiv Sena) were directly responsible for the killings in this incident. These killings were investigated in an unofficial inquiry headed by retired Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer. The inquiry included gathering and analysis of 2094 oral and written testimonies, both individual and collective, from victim-survivors and also independent human rights groups, women's groups, NGOs and academics. The findings were published in the report Crime Against Humanity - An Inquiry into the Carnage in Gujarat http://www.sabrang.com/tribunal/. Another valuable reference work is Siddharth Varadarajan's book, Gujarat: The Making of a Tragedyhttp://us.penguingroup.com/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0,,0_0143029010,00.html According to this report, the Sangh Parivar, in particular the BJP, the VHP, and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, encouraged, supported and participated in the violence http://www.sabrang.com/tribunal/vol2/prepvio.html. However, some observers claim that several events in the report Crime Against Humanity - An Inquiry into the Carnage in Gujarat are fictitious. Moreover, they claim that the opinions of Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer are biased by his left-wing politics; in particular, they attach importance to his role as a Kerala state government minister in the 1957 Communist Party government of E. M. S. Namboodiripad, and as a candidate for President of India in 1987, chosen by the opposition against the ruling Congress Party. Electoral consequences In subsequent state elections in late 2002, the BJP was re-elected to government in Gujarat with a landslide victory. Arrests and charging of alleged perpetrators during 2003 As of mid October 2003, about 80 people - all who identify themselves as Muslims - had been charged and arrested in relation to these incidents with the charge of conspiracy against the state. Almost all have been charged under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA). According to Amnesty International, the arrestees have been subjected to arbitrary and illegal and incommunicado detention, have been denied access to lawyers, relatives, and medical attention, and have been tortured. http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA200292003?open&of=ENG-IND On November 24, 2003, a sessions court judge in the Nadiad district found 15 people guilty (out of 63 accused) for the killing of 14 Muslims on March 3, 2002 in the village of Ghodasar. See also Best Bakery Case racism ethnic stereotype - stereotyping ethnic conflict in India External references Crime Against Humanity - An Inquiry into the Carnage in Gujarat alleged implication of Sangh Parivar After the carnage: the predatory 'intelligentsia' Human Rights Watch report on state participation in the riots Godhra's bitter harvest -- BBC report on Godhra, one year later. Amnesty International report on conspiracy against the state charges Most Popular Articles: Music    Musical Instruments    Guitar    Classical Music    History    Music Definition    Country Music    Rock Music    Pop Music    Hip Hop    Rap    DJ    Video Games    Casino Games    Poker    Blackjack    Casinos    Real Estate    Loan    Auction    eBay    Marketing    Search Engine Optimization    File Sharing    MP3    Music Industry    Kazaa    Internet    Supermodel    Fashion    Fashion Designers    Erotica    Modeling    Clothing    Boots    Shoes    Diamond Engagement Rings    Diamond    Rugs    Gospel Music    Affiliate    E-Commerce    Radio This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License at http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html You may copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license. You must provide a link to http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html To view or edit this article at Wikipedia go to http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Gujarat_violence